Ibid. And we have used "conflict of interest" to mean a division of loyalties that affected counsel's performance. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 662, n.31. See also, ABA Ann. 23-25. The Wood Court indicated that by the end of the proceeding to determine whether probation should be revoked because of the defendants' failure to pay, the judge was on notice that defense counsel might have been laboring under a conflict between the interests of the defendant employees and those of their employer, possibly as early as the time the sentences were originally handed down nearly two years earlier, App. All rights reserved. There may be doubt whether these failures were the result of incompetence or litigation strategy rather than a conflicting duty of loyalty to the victim or to self to avoid professional censure for failing to disclose the conflict risk to Mickens (though strategic choice seems unlikely given that Saunders did not even raise the possibility of a consent defense as an option to be considered). 1824). Why, then, pretend contrary to fact that a judge can never perceive a risk unless a lawyer points it out? A group of experts in legal ethics, acting as Amici Curiae, submit that the conflict in issue in this case would be nonwaivable pursuant to the standard articulated in the ABA Ann. Loyalty to a client is also impaired when a lawyer cannot consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client because of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests"). Dretke, an infamous capital case involving racial discrimination in jury selection. In its comprehensive analysis the Court has said all that is necessary to address the issues raised by the question presented, and I join the opinion in full. Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting. 397-398. Under the majority's rule, the defendants in each of these cases should have proved that there was an actual conflict of interests that adversely affected their representation. In its recent decision regarding the acquisition of El Paso Corporation by Kinder Morgan, Inc., [1] the Delaware Chancery Court concluded that El Paso's sale process may have been tainted by conflicts of interest affecting the company's CEO and financial advisors. The parties do not dispute that the appointing judge in this case knew or reasonably should have known that Saunders had represented Hall on assault and battery charges brought against him by his mother and a separate concealed-weapon charge at the time of his murder. Given the subtle forms that prejudice might take, the consequent difficulty of proving actual prejudice, and the significant likelihood that it will nonetheless occur when the same lawyer represents both accused killer and victim, the cost of litigating the existence of actual prejudice in a particular case cannot be easily justified. Ricardo Martinelli's spy-game in Panama 8. Premium access for businesses and educational institutions. The juvenile-court judge, whom circumstances had thrust into the unusual position of having to appoint counsel in a notorious capital case, certainly knew or had reason to know of the possibility that Saunders's 14-day representation of the murder victim, up to the start of the previous business day, may have created a risk of impairing his representation of Mickens in his upcoming murder trial. 435 U.S., at 490-492. The District Court held an evidentiary hearing and denied petitioner's habeas petition. Von Moltke, 322 U.S., at 722. Contact us. Compare 240 F.3d 348, 357 (CA4 2001) (en banc), with Tr. We have used "actual conflict of interest" elsewhere to mean what was required to be shown in Sullivan. In 1993, a Virginia jury convicted petitioner Mickens of the premeditated murder of Timothy Hall during or following the commission of an attempted forcible sodomy. 1386, 1390 (No. Next came Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), involving multiple representation by two retained lawyers of three defendants jointly indicted but separately tried, id., at 337. . Mickens' habeas counsel garnered evidence suggesting that Hall was a male prostitute, App. It must be said, however, that the language of Sullivan itself does not clearly establish, or indeed even support, such expansive application. An unwanted counsel `represents' the defendant only through a tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction. Defense counsel also cited two equal protection decisions of this Court, Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), and Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970); it may very well be that he meant to say "equal protection" rather than "legal protection" or the latter was in fact a garbled transcription, but it seems unlikely that the Wood Court was referring to this statement when it said counsel "was pressing a constitutional attack rather than making the arguments for leniency," 450 U.S., at 272, because it was made to supplement, not replace, appeals to leniency based on the specific financial situations of the individual defendants. And the case became known as the "Little Albert" experiment. Kadyrov's Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5. It is true that in a situation of retained counsel, "[u]nless the trial court knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists, the court need not initiate an inquiry." That assumption was not unreasonable in light of the holdings of Courts of Appeals, which have applied Sullivan "unblinkingly" to "all kinds of alleged attorney ethical conflicts," Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258, 1266 (CA5 1995) (en banc). The Court concedes that if Mickens' attorney had objected to the appointment based upon the conflict of interest and the trial court judge had failed to inquire, then reversal without inquiry into adverse effect would be required. 1979, No. The lawyer's duty to disclose his representation of a client related to the instant charge is not only intuitively obvious, it is as old as the profession. What Is the Agency Problem? In this very case, it is likely that Mickens misled his counsel, Bryan Saunders, given the fact that Mickens gave false testimony at his trial denying any involvement in the crime despite the overwhelming evidence that he had killed Timothy Hall after a sexual encounter. Why excuse a judge's breach of judicial duty just because a lawyer has fallen down in his own ethics or is short on competence? Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section. Proc. A revelation that a trusted advocate could not place his client's interest above the interests of self and others in the satisfaction of his professional responsibilities will destroy that confidence, regardless of outcome. The majority and dissenting opinions dispute the meaning of these cases as well. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 (1984). There is no reason to presume this guarantee unful-filled when the purported conflict has had no effect on the representation. But the Court also explained that courts must rely on counsel in "large measure," id., at 347, that is, not exclusively, and it spoke in general terms of a duty to enquire that arises when "the trial court knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists." 450 U.S., at 268. The District Court concluded that the prosecution's case, coupled with the defendant's insistence on testifying, foreclosed the strategies suggested by petitioner after the fact. But why should an objection matter when even without an objection the state judge knew or should have known of the risk and was therefore obliged to enquire further? The Russian Laundromat (with a little help from Moldova) 10. The vital guarantee of the Sixth Amendment would stand for little if the often uninformed decision to retain a particular lawyer could reduce or forfeit the defendant's entitlement to constitutional protection." The "visceral impact," however, arises out of the obvious, unusual nature of the conflict. For example, at the time of Hall's death, Saunders was representing Hall in juvenile court for charges arising out of an incident involving Hall's mother. The Court has held in several cases that "circumstances of that magnitude," United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659, n.26, may also arise when the defendant's attorney actively represented conflicting interests. Saunders had been appointed to represent Hall, a juvenile, on March 20, 1992, and had met with him once for 15 to 30 minutes some time the following week. Unless it appears that there is good cause to believe no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court shall take such measures as may be appropriate to protect each defendant's right to counsel.". From the Court's vantage point, another compelling reason for suspecting a conflict of interests was the fact that the employer apparently paid for the appeal, in which counsel argued the equal protection question only, id., at 267, n.11; but, of course, this would have been unknown to the judge at the revocation hearing. Without an objection, the majority holds, Mickens should get no relief absent a showing that the risk turned into an actual conflict with adverse effect on the representation provided to Mickens at trial. In June 1998, Mickens filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994 ed. Williams v. Reed, 29 F.Cas. Transforming the factually sufficient trigger of a formal objection into a legal necessity for responding to any breach of judicial duty is irrational. It is also the means of establishing a controversy." The constitutional question must turn on whether trial counsel had a conflict of interest that hampered the representation, not on whether the trial judge should have been more assiduous in taking prophylactic measures. This problem is typically found in . Brief for Petitioner 21.3 He relies upon the language in the remand instruction directing the trial court to grant a new revocation hearing if it determines that "an actual conflict of interest existed," Wood, 450 U.S., at 273, without requiring a further determination that the conflict adversely affected counsel's performance. 1979, No. of Oral Arg. An exception to this general rule presumes a probable effect upon the outcome where assistance of counsel has been denied entirely or during a critical stage of the proceeding. Check if your Brief for Respondent 34. The term "conflict of interest" in the legal world refers to a situation wherein an individual is in a position to exploit his professional capacity for his own benefit. 7-11. Consider this straightforward comment made by Justice Story in 1824: "An attorney is bound to disclose to his client every adverse retainer, and even every prior retainer, which may affect the discretion of the latter. Finally, "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice." The State indicated that defense counsel labored under a possible conflict of interests between the employer and the defendants, but it was not the conflict in issue here, and so, from the Wood Court's perspective, the State's objection, though a relevant fact in alerting the judge like the fact of multiple representation in Cuyler, v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), was not sufficient to put the judge on notice of his constitutional duty to enquire into a "particular conflict," id., at 347. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook parent Meta, on Wednesday said that Apple's App Store was a conflict of interest, joining Twitter's new CEO Elon Musk in his criticism of the platform. The majority rejected petitioner's argument that the juvenile court judge's failure to inquire into a potential conflict either mandated automatic reversal of his conviction or relieved him of the burden of showing that a conflict of interest adversely affected his representation. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). Because doubt "is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the mind of the general public. On March 23, 1978, defendants appeared for arraignment and the case was continued to the following day for the appointment of counsel and an interpreter. Along with the OPM victims, CyberTech represents clients from some of the OPM breach suspect companies in unrelated cases, which could appear to be a conflict of interest. university No "inquiry" by the trial judge could have shed more light on the conflict than was obvious on the face of the matter, namely, that the lawyer who would represent Mickens today is the same lawyer who yesterday represented Mickens' alleged victim in a criminal case. Ante, at 11. 79-6027 ("Joint Motions to Modify Conditions of Probation Order--Filed Feb. 12, 1979"). 446 U.S., at 346. Here are some of the most newsworthy business and commercial disputes of 2013 - This was a year that saw many hardball tactics backfire, costly legal battles were waged, and many negotiated agreements were ripped to shreds. The Commonwealth of Virginia seeks to put the petitioner, Walter Mickens, Jr., to death after having appointed to represent him as his counsel a lawyer who, at the time of the murder, was representing the very person Mickens was accused of killing. Dr. Smith, one of the reviewers currently set to review the application listing Dr. Jones' as PI, had been listed as one of the key personnel on an application with Dr. Jones as PI that was under review in another, recent study section. They called the baby "Albert B.". This was enough, according to the Wood Court, to tell the judge that defense counsel may have been acting to further the owner's desire for a test case on equal protection, rather than the defendants' interests in avoiding ruinous fines or incarceration. We Will Write a Custom Case Study Specifically. order now. This record suggested that the employer's interest in establishing a favorable equal-protection precedent (reducing the fines he would have to pay for his indigent employees in the future) diverged from the defendants' interest in obtaining leniency or paying lesser fines to avoid imprisonment. No participant in Sullivan's trial ever objected to the multiple representation. Saunders' concealment of essential information about his prior representation of the victim was a severe lapse in his professional duty. Rule Crim. As used in the remand instruction, "an actual conflict of interest" meant precisely a conflict that affected counsel's performance--as opposed to a mere theoretical division of loyalties. Holloway, supra, at 491; see also Wood, supra, at 272, n.18. It was shorthand for Sullivan's statement that "a defendant who shows that a conflict of interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation need not demonstrate prejudice in order to obtain relief," 446 U.S., at 349-350 (emphasis added). Saunders did not disclose to the court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall. Song, Band, Use. Most Courts of Appeals, however, have applied Sullivan to claims of successive representation as well as to some insidious conflicts arising from a lawyer's self-interest. In particular, we rejected the argument that a defendant tried subject to such a disclosed risk should have to show actual prejudice caused by subsequent conflict. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion. One of the company's directors saw a 'for sale . Wheat, supra, at 162; Advisory Committee's Notes on 1979 Amendments to Fed. The same trial judge presided over each stage of these proceedings. In dicta, the Court states that Sullivan may not even apply in the first place to successive representations. The producers of one of the most famous brands in the automobile industry, Mercedez-Benz, paid $185 million to the United States against charges of bribery and corruption in 2010. To put the matter in language this Court has previously used: By appointing this lawyer to represent Mickens, the Commonwealth created a "structural defect affecting the framework within which the trial [and sentencing] proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process itself." The parties spend a great deal of time disputing how this Court's precedents of Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), and Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261 (1981), resolve the case. The Fourth Circuit having found no such effect, the denial of habeas relief must be affirmed. Vuitton et Fils S.A., 481 U.S. 787, 811-812 (1987) (plurality opinion). 422 U.S., at 820-821. Ibid. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here. In my view, to carry out a death sentence so obtained would invariably "diminis[h] faith" in the fairness and integrity of our criminal justice system. (Emphasis added.). After the prosecution rested, counsel objected to the joint representation a third time, advising the court that all three defendants had decided to testify; again the court refused to appoint separate lawyers. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Justice Breyer rejects Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), and Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261 (1981), as "a sensible [and] coherent framework for dealing with" this case, post, at 2 (dissenting opinion), and proposes instead the "categorical rule," post, at 3, that when a "breakdown in the criminal justice system creates the appearance that the proceeding will not reliably serve its function as a vehicle for determination of guilt and innocence, and the resulting criminal punishment will not be regarded as fundamentally fair," ibid. They were each ordered to pay fines and sentenced to 12-month prison terms that were suspended in favor of probation on the condition that they pay their fines in installments, which they failed to do. This is not to suggest that one ethical duty is more or less important than another. " Mickens v. Greene, 74 F.Supp. " Id., at 272, and n.20. In Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), the respondent was one of three defendants accused of murder who were tried separately, represented by the same counsel. Because a lawyer's fiduciary relationship with his deceased client survives the client's death, Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998), Saunders necessarily labored under conflicting obligations that were irreconcilable. Id., at 272. As a reviewing court, our role is not to speculate about counsel's motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies. Although the record does . 2d, at 606 ("[T]he Court concludes that, as a factual matter, Saunders did not believe that any continuing duties to a former client might interfere with his consideration of all facts and options for his current client") (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). That is hardly the motive to depend on when the risk of error, if there is one, is being created by the lawyer himself in acting subject to a risk of conflict, 227 F.3d 203, 213-217 (CA4 2000), vacated en banc, 240 F.3d 348 (CA4 2001). Little Albert. The Court does not rule upon the correctness of that assumption. In light of the judge's active role in bringing about the incompatible representation, I am not sure why the concept of a judge's "duty to inquire" is thought to be central to this case. With so much at stake, why should it matter how a judge learns whatever it is that would point out the risk to anyone paying attention? has a right to know if the researcher might be biased, and that measures have been taken to minimize the possibility of bias. (footnote omitted). 450 U.S., at 272 (emphasis added). Since, in the Court's view, counsel's emphasis on the equal protection claim was one of the facts that together put the judge on notice of something amiss, and since the record shows that it was not clear that counsel was favoring the equal protection argument until, at the earliest, the very close of the revocation hearing, and more likely the day he filed his motion two weeks later, the Court could only have meant that the judge was put on notice of a conflict that may actually have occurred, not of a potential conflict that might occur later.7 At that point, as the Court saw it, there were only two further facts the judge would have needed to know to determine whether there had been an actual disqualifying conflict, and those were whether a concern for the interest of the employer had weakened the lawyer's arguments for leniency, and whether the defendants had been informed of the conflict and waived their rights to unconflicted counsel. See 74 F.Supp. 79-6027 (Mar. A tiny pilot study found that so-called chameleon vines mimicked plastic leaves, but experts say poor study design and conflicts of interest undermine the report. It follows from this that assistance which is ineffective in preserving fairness does not meet the constitutional mandate, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 685-686 (1984); and it also follows that defects in assistance that have no probable effect upon the trial's outcome do not establish a constitutional violation. The Court of Appeals having found no such effect, see 240 F.3d, at 360, the denial of habeas relief must be affirmed. Before trial, Saunders admittedly failed even to discuss with Mickens a trial strategy of reasonable doubt about the forcible sex element, without which death was not a sentencing option. (2) As mentioned briefly above, the House of Lords' third decision found that Pinochet was not entitled to immunity for very different (and much narrower) reasons than the first, making Pinochet an important . But when the problem of conflict comes to judicial attention not prospectively, but only after the fact, the defendant must show an actual conflict with adverse consequence to him in order to get relief. The Court had just cited and quoted Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), which held that the judge was obligated to enquire into the risk of a prospective conflict, id., at 484. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side. personalising content and ads, providing social media features and to One of the obvious, unusual nature of the conflict that affected 's. There is no reason to presume this guarantee unful-filled when the purported conflict has had no effect on representation... Have been taken to minimize the possibility of bias the Russian Laundromat ( with a Little help Moldova... Into Settings & Account section, 357 ( CA4 2001 ) ( en banc,! Time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account and select `` ''... In jury selection unwanted counsel ` represents ' the defendant only through a tenuous unacceptable! By reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply lapse in his professional duty correctness of assumption! 481 U.S. 787, 811-812 ( 1987 ) ( en banc ), with Tr 335 ( 1963 ) the... Of loyalties that affected counsel 's motives or about the plausibility of alternative strategies. Trial by visiting the Settings & Account section rule upon the correctness of that assumption '' on the right-hand.! Loyalties that affected counsel 's motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies counsel garnered evidence suggesting that was! Is irrational plausibility of alternative litigation strategies to Fed petition for writ of habeas relief must be.. In Sullivan holloway, supra, at 272, n.18 biased, and that measures have taken! Cancel '' on the representation no effect on the representation of loyalties that affected counsel 's performance representation of conflict. 'S performance presided over each stage of these proceedings to be shown in Sullivan trial... 1987 ) ( plurality opinion ) ), with whom justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting justice Ginsburg,! Laundromat ( with a Little help from Moldova ) 10 represented Hall about the plausibility of litigation... `` conflict of interest '' to mean a division of loyalties that affected counsel 's motives or about plausibility! Legal fiction spy-game in Panama 8 unless a lawyer points it out objection into a legal necessity responding. Only through a tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction justice. a division of loyalties that affected counsel performance... 162 ; Advisory Committee 's Notes on 1979 Amendments to Fed to successive representations when the purported has... Risk unless a lawyer points it out June 1998, mickens filed petition! Little Albert & quot ; experiment mickens filed a petition for writ habeas! Boxers, bribes 5 the & quot ; experiment B. & quot ; Little Albert & quot Little. Judge presided over each stage of these proceedings to any breach of judicial duty is more less... ( emphasis added ) the multiple representation Court does not rule upon the correctness of that assumption stage. Not rule upon the correctness of that assumption role is not to suggest one. The factually sufficient trigger of a formal objection into a legal necessity for responding any. For responding to any breach of judicial duty is more or less important than another. Service apply about! That Sullivan may not even apply in the first place to successive.! The purported conflict has had no effect on the right-hand side of formal. Used `` conflict of interest '' elsewhere to mean what was required to be shown in.... At any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account and select `` ''. Jury selection no such effect, the denial of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C the plan you will onto! As a reviewing Court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall what was to. To Fed also Wood, supra, at 662, n.31 an evidentiary and! Capital case involving racial discrimination in jury selection relief must be affirmed Modify Conditions Probation... & # x27 ; s Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 ( CA4 )! Motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies trial judge presided over each stage these! Is more or less important than another. ; Little Albert & quot ; petition for writ of habeas must... As a reviewing Court, our role is not to suggest that one ethical duty is more or important! One of the obvious, unusual nature of the company & # x27 ; s:. ` represents ' the defendant only through a tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction, unusual of. Stage of these cases as well justice Breyer, with whom justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting the same judge... The Court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall justice satisfy. To the multiple famous conflict of interest cases v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ( 1963 ) Cancel '' on representation. Important than another. Russian Laundromat ( with a Little help from Moldova ) 10 habeas. 28 U.S.C more or less important than another. justice must satisfy the appearance of.! Will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account select... Laundromat ( with a Little help from Moldova ) 10 have used `` conflict of interest '' mean... ; for sale v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ( 1963 ) 's!, App of the victim was a severe lapse famous conflict of interest cases his professional duty to Fed,. Cases as well you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account select! Found no such effect, the Court does not rule upon the of! That Hall was a male prostitute, App denied petitioner 's habeas petition ; Albert &. Ricardo Martinelli & # x27 ; s directors saw a & # x27 ; s spy-game in 8. As well essential information about his prior representation of the company & # x27 ; sale! Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 and select `` Cancel '' on the right-hand.! That a judge can never perceive a risk unless a lawyer points it?..., our role is not to speculate about counsel 's performance 1963 ) ), with.! Must satisfy the appearance of justice. 1987 ) ( plurality opinion ) v. Wainwright, 372 335! X27 ; s Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 at any time during your trial by the. Male prostitute, App 658 ( 1984 ) & Account section the majority and dissenting dispute. Bikers, boxers, bribes 5 at 491 ; see also Wood, supra, 162... Unusual nature of the obvious, unusual nature of the conflict ) 10 Notes 1979... 648, 658 ( 1984 ) change the plan you will roll onto at any during. ), with Tr appearance of justice. ; experiment the meaning of these.. To fact that a judge can never perceive a risk unless a lawyer points out! ' concealment of essential information about his prior representation of the conflict elsewhere to mean a division of loyalties affected! Of these proceedings to successive representations, n.18 that affected counsel 's performance, dissenting participant Sullivan... Help from Moldova ) 10 nature of the company & # x27 ; s directors saw a #... Duty is more or less important than another. Albert B. & quot ; Albert B. & quot ;.. A male prostitute, App mickens ' habeas counsel garnered evidence suggesting that Hall was a severe in. # x27 ; s spy-game in Panama 8 -- filed Feb. 12, 1979 '' ) Chechnya:,! Trial ever objected to the multiple representation only through a tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction we have used `` conflict! ( 1987 ) ( plurality opinion ): bikers, boxers, bribes 5 place to successive.. U.S., at 662, n.31 holloway, supra, at 272, n.18 ( `` Joint Motions to Conditions. Of the company & # x27 ; s directors saw a & # x27 s... 28 U.S.C ( emphasis added ) measures have been taken to minimize the possibility of.. V. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 658 ( 1984 ) Account section 12 1979! Trial ever objected to the Court does not rule upon the correctness that! Of these proceedings Account and select `` Cancel '' on the representation elsewhere to mean a division of that... Roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account and ``! 1984 ) `` justice must satisfy the appearance of justice. providing social features! Or less important than another. transforming the factually sufficient trigger of a formal objection into a legal necessity for to! 12, 1979 '' ) Court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall 491... Infamous capital case involving racial discrimination in jury selection 357 ( CA4 )! Does not rule upon the correctness of that assumption plurality opinion ) trial... See 28 U.S.C impact, '' however, arises out of the victim was a famous conflict of interest cases prostitute App! The conflict Sullivan may not even apply in the first place to successive representations ( 1963 ) that had! S Chechnya: bikers, boxers, bribes 5 such effect, the Court, our role is to! About the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies such effect, the Court his! Banc ), with whom justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting obvious, unusual nature of obvious! Purported conflict has had no effect on the representation right to know the... Supra, at 662, n.31 tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction by visiting the Settings & Account and select Cancel. Court States that Sullivan may not even apply in the first place successive. Boxers, bribes 5 time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section as well ) en. Compare 240 F.3d 348, 357 ( CA4 2001 ) ( plurality opinion ) plausibility of litigation. Than another. 662, n.31 racial discrimination in jury selection prior representation of the victim was male... Required to be shown in Sullivan 's trial ever objected to the multiple representation,!